We’ve moved! Check out our FULL article here. Summary below.
The Veteran Abrams electric unicycle (EUC) has garnered attention as a potential rival to the popular Veteran Sherman. This article provides insights and early impressions of the Abrams based on testing and experience. The review highlights both the positive and negative aspects of the Abrams.
Pros:
- Boasts a powerful 3500W motor, surpassing the Sherman’s 2500W.
- Exhibits responsive acceleration and braking.
- Offers a large and stable platform, particularly well-suited for seated riding.
- Features an attractive design with a roll cage that serves as convenient handles.
- Maintains the familiar design and controls from the Veteran Sherman.
- Equipped with spacious studded foot plates.
- Comes with a tall, comfortable trolley handle.
- Includes a bright headlight with adjustable angle.
- Features an integrated fender for wet road conditions.
Cons:
- Heavily built and not ideal for off-road riding.
- Prone to accumulating debris and water inside the wheel.
- Exposed bearing is susceptible to rust and damage.
- Battery capacity is relatively small at 2700Wh, compared to the Sherman’s 3200Wh.
- The display screen may require an update.
The unboxing experience had its ups and downs, with the Abrams arriving in good condition, although the tubeless tire was flat due to sealant leakage. The Abrams’ specifications include a 22″ tubeless knobby tire, a 2700Wh battery, a 3500W motor, an estimated range of 80 miles, a top speed of 50 mph, and an IP65 water resistance rating.
First impressions of the Abrams highlight its substantial weight and size, with initial construction quality appearing satisfactory. Setup is straightforward without the need for a complicated app. The ride feel was surprisingly smooth, although the wheel’s weight is a concern for new riders. Acceleration and braking improved significantly after installing the stock pads. The headlight offers excellent adjustability.
The Abrams is not recommended for beginners, short riders, or those seeking a portable option. Despite being labeled “OFF-ROAD,” it is not suitable for technical off-road riding due to its weight. Early reports mention concerns about water and debris accumulation and potential bearing failures. Marathon riders may find the battery capacity lacking.
However, experienced riders who favor large, stable wheels and seated riding will appreciate the Abrams’ powerful motor. The ride is stable and suitable for taller riders. The wheel’s overall appeal was unexpectedly high.
The article notes that time and additional mileage are needed to assess long-term performance. While issues such as a flat tire with sealant leakage are unsurprising for early batches, the Abrams is expected to have a more polished finish given its price point.
Andrew, one of the testers, has developed a strong affinity for the Abrams, as it aligns with his preferences for big wheels, power, and shorter rides. The review concludes by emphasizing the need for more extensive testing and updates as additional experience is gained with the Veteran Abrams.
Keep reading our FULL article here.